Expert reports are lengthy, technical, and dense. Legal teams must rapidly understand what the expert was asked to do, what opinions are being offered, what assumptions underpin them, and where the methodology is vulnerable to challenge. Without a structured first pass, gaps in scope, qualification, and reasoning go undetected until they surface at the worst possible moment in the matter.

Apply targeted Question Lists to the expert report, CV, appendices, exhibits, and key underlying materials. Question Lists can be run individually or in combination depending on the review objective, returning structured, citation-backed outputs tied directly to source materials. Teams can identify core opinions, test assumptions, surface weaknesses, and build challenge strategy earlier in the case.