Inconsistencies that would take days to find manually, surfaced and ready to use for impeachment or motion practice.
The challenge
Comparing deposition transcripts, interview summaries, and affidavits across a complex matter requires attorneys to manually cross-reference statements made by the same witness over time, identify discrepancies between witnesses on key factual points, and flag language that may contradict documentary evidence. This is time-consuming, difficult to do consistently, and easy to get wrong under trial pressure.
The solution
Ask iManage flags conflicting statements made by the same witness across different dates, highlights discrepancies between witnesses on key factual points, and surfaces language that may contradict documentary evidence. This gives litigation teams a targeted list of inconsistencies ready for impeachment, motions, or further discovery.
From your Folder, Workspace or Matter, select relevant documents then open Ask iManage and Start a review.
Instantly scope to only the documents which matter, keeping your responses and citations relevant.
Craft a prompt to compare and highlight inconsistencies.
With just one prompt, you can analyze testimony across witnesses to identify points of contention or areas where further investigation needs to be done.
Copy this prompt
Use a Guided Action (e.g. Overview) against a specific document to dig deeper into testimony.
With the Ask iManage workflow, you can easily navigate between working with sets or documents, or digging deeper into individual documents without leaving iManage Work.
Return to your review and add additional documents to broaden your analysis.
Run a prompt to compare documents added with depositions to identify mismatches or unsupported claims.
Copy this prompt
More to explore
Depositions
Question List
Working with Depositions
Tips & Tricks
Creating a Consolidated Litigation Case Memory
Use Case